|

(JUST LIKE) STARTING OVER
Michael Leonard - GUITAR MAGAZINE 1993
With The Thes first album in four years, Dusk, Matt Johnson has attempted
to return to the songwriting and production values of 20 years ago. He
tells Michael Leonard about his love of Lennon, Robbie Kriegers guitar
and why Johnny Marrs getting scared of him.
I love this job! Matt Johnson smiles. Its
tough but I wouldnt want to be anyone else. A
lot of artists dont like doing interviews but a lot
of artists are thick as shit. A lot of them have a problem
explaining their songs because their songs are nonsense! It
might seem like Im being a bit hard here but a lot
of them cant write songs their words are just
gobbledygook and they just do it to get their face in the
papers.
In his 14 year musical career so far, Matt Johnson has earned himself
a dual reputation the first, rightly so, as one of the best songwriters
of his generation; the second, less justifiably, as a grumpy old sod. Still,
a new The The album is a rare and rewarding occurrence so his playful opposition-baiting
can be forgiven. His new album for The The is to all intents and
purposes solely Johnsons vehicle is called Dusk and again features
ex-Smiths Johnny Marr partnering the singer-songwriter on guitar. Despite
being one of the first people to investigate the potential of drum loops
and samples (on 1981s Burning Blue Soul), Dusk represents a return to basics
for Johnson. Their recent single, Dogs Of Lust, is a loping, R&B influenced
track (with some mean harmonica from Marr) and tracks such as Slow Emotion Replay
and True Happiness This Way Lies showcase a stripped down sound that wouldnt
normally be associated with a man who once used 62 musicians on one album.
I wanted the production to be transparent on this album. Weve emphasised
the songs and the performances. I got a bit bored with production to tell
you the truth, bored with trying to stay ahead, because I have done things in
the past that were very much on the cutting edge. Things like the distorted
megaphone vocals, all most my trademark things, I started to hear on other peoples
records so Ive just left them to get on with it. Theres so
much technology coming out now I think a lot of it is just like an obstacle between
the emotion youre trying to express and the audience. I wanted to
clear away a lot of the clutter and go back to very classic and simple song structures,
almost like 1971 with Neil Youngs Harvest or John Lennons first solo
album. Theres an elegance in simplicity. Doing the tour in 1990
I realised that a lot of the arrangements of my previous songs were flawed because
theyd never been played live four albums worth of flawed material
right, heh heh!
For many years I was just getting musicians into the studio and telling
them exactly what to do but to get a band response going again was really good. When
I was writing this album I was thinking in terms of keeping it very simple with
only five people playing at any one time. On stuff Ive written in
the past I never took that into consideration and ended up with scores of people
playing on one single track and its not always best for the song.
Although not a writer in the technical sense he cant read or write
music Johnson has been a self sufficient songsmith all his professional
life.
Im not a great musician and Ive never really practised as such,
its songwriting that really interests me. I like things simple and
Ive found that real musicians have a tendency to over-elaborate. Theyre
always wanting to add in a few jazz chords here and there or a few bass slaps
and I hate all that! Its funny, but when I was on the tour and the others
would be sound-checking and Id just hear this bloody awful Jazz Funk band
and think, Oh my god, this is MY band! Ha ha! We couldnt have any
of that, its just got to be in service of the song so I try and chop all
the fat out and get to the essence.
Despite Johnny Marrs reputation as writer in his own right, he seems happy
to leave the spotlight to Johnson in The The. Marrs influence can
be heard clearly on tracks like The Beat(en) Generation and Slow Emotion Replay
(from Dusk), but Johnson says one of the most vital things the ex-Smith brings
to The The is encouragement.
He understands what Im trying to do and he believes in it. I
dont want to be just another member of a band because I had it earlier
on when I was a kid and remember all the egos getting in the way. I think
you have to have a benevolent dictator with a vision otherwise you get
everyone bickering and arguing. I know so many bands who are really good
but they cant make a decision because they are too busy arguing. The
people involved in The The were interested, I guess, because they liked what
I do but a lot of bands seem to stay together solely for business reasons yknow,
they all have a stake in the name or something. Situations like that cant
be good for the music.
With a love for the direct, particularly when it comes to lyrics, its not
surprising that Johnsons big songwriting hero is John Lennon. In the
East End pub where he grew up, the only LP his parents owned was The Beatles
White Album which he played constantly.
But because youre young, you tend not to analyse your influences
so with The Beatles, I never realised at the time how awful Paul McCartneys
lyrics were ha ha! Some of those songs, Rocky Raccoon and stuff, are nice
for little kids and I actually like the atmosphere on that but
as you get a bit older you kinda think, Oh shit, this is childrens
music! With Lennon, I think I grew to like him more the older I got.
Im probably in the minority view, but to me John Lennon dwarfed Bob
Dylan. I think Dylan has done a few good albums but Ive generally
found him to be incredibly overrated. 30 or so albums and lets face it the
majority have been crap! But he did some absolutely great stuff in the 60s
and the pressure that the guy was put under was so immense that I dont
think anyone couldve lived up to his reputation. I think hes
said himself that he envies certain songwriters that didnt have that pressure,
and I think he could have been much greater. I feel sorry for him
in a way, because I think it ruined him. You look at some of the lyrics
of that free-form word association and its just gobbledygook. At
the time I reckon it was a case of the Emperors New Clothes with everyone
too embarrassed to say they didnt like it. With John Lennon, it was
plain, simple, and direct you knew straight away where he stood and you
either agreed or disagreed, you either responded to it or you didnt. Also,
the tone of both his voice and the music he created was such that you didnt
even have to hear what he was singing, you could just hear it on the radio and
it would give you goosebumps.
Hes probably the only British songwriter that I like as most of the
others are American like Tim Buckley, who I adore as a singer rather than
a songwriter. Then Lou Reed, I think Magic and Loss was the best album
hes made since Berlin and although he made some abysmal stuff during the 80s
his earlier stuff with the Velvet Underground is still great. I also listen
to Hank Williams, Robert Johnson stuff which is simple and direct yet
has an intensity and a reverberation beyond its time, stuff that transcends fashion.
Johnson and Marr plan to hit the studio later this year with just guitars in
hand to record two EPs in tribute to the latter two artists The The Play
Hank and The The Play Bob! With both peers and Johnson himself having a
reputation as tortured souls, he must surely be an advocate of the old Blues
axiom that great art is born out of suffering?
Yeah I suppose, but its a bit of a cliché, the old suffering
artist isnt it? All human beings suffer in their life, we all lose
people dear to us, we all suffer from emotional anxiety, and people who are artistic
dont suffer anymore than people you are not artistic. I do think
that suffering deepens you though you become more sensitive to other people
and the world around you and it makes you more compassionate. The problem
is, people tend to just apply it to arty types and thats just
bollocks,
ha ha ha!
But arent artists assumed to be suffering types because they emotionally
open themselves up much more willingly than the average person? Does that
mean Johnson deliberates a lot over what he actually commits to tape?
For the camp that Im in, where the lyrics tend to be confessional
and mostly autobiographical, then I think so. Youre putting your
balls on the line and some things are even too close to the bone to say because
everyone has secrets, even people whove been married for 20 years, so you
cant give away everything in a song.
Even so, I find the process very therapeutic. Of course, when Im
away from music Ill be out with my mates having a few drinks and a laugh,
but its hard to write about happiness. The thing is, name me your
favourite three lyricists who write happy songs thats a good quiz!
The subject matter of my songs is very much like what Blues singers would
sing about lust, love and loneliness - and also some political things. I
think every generation of songwriters should bring something new to the form
so instead of pretending youre the Rolling Stones or the Velvet Underground which,
unfortunately, a lot of bands still do - why not react to the world thats
around us now, utilise the technology and also bring in a new subject matter?
You had people as talented as Hendrix and the Beatles since the60s
but they havent had the same global impact because everything then was
relatively new. So now people have got to try and write about male sexuality
in a non-macho way, try and write about relationships in a different way, write
about things like religion, about affairs of the human spirit, political things.
My reputation for being miserable might be my own fault but if one journalist
writes that youre a depressed person then before you know it youre
being portrayed as the new Leonard Cohen. Its limiting because as
soon as your name comes up, people put you in a box youre put
in the miserable, depressed songwriter box, or the inane innocuous box.
I think songwriting as a form of expression is art, he concludes. The
best of it stands alongside poetry, painting and filmmaking. It might sound
pretentious but I think at its highest form its beautiful and can have
more power than a poem more people certainly relate to it. The term
Pop has become a derogatory term its true but people like Neil Young, Lou
Reed and John Lennon will be remembered as classic artists. In that way, Im
optimistic about the future of music.
Despite the epic, sweeping quality of much of the music on The Thes last
two albums, Infected and Mind Bomb, Johnson is writing more simply now than every
before. When hes got the bare bones of a song etched out on acoustic
guitar he demos it with a drum machine and maybe a sequencer part. Increasingly
though, its just about me and an acoustic guitar. I think if a song
sounds good on just acoustic guitar then it IS good. Thats a song
as opposed to a track. A lot of modern records are just tracks and if you
take away the production then they cease to exist.
The guitar I use most is this lovely Gibson 345 which used to belong to
Robbie Krieger from the Doors. The tone is wonderful, really creamy and
warm. I bought it in America a couple of years ago but had a lot of trouble
getting it back here. They gave me a bill in America for less than its
worth they said that everyone did that but it got confiscated at
customs and I had to get a lawyer down to the airport. It was so embarrassing
I had to go back and say sorry to the customs people, heh heh! Ive
also got an electric Fender 12-string which Johnny gave to me after hed
worked on Mind Bomb which was a lovely gift. Then Ive got a Takamine
6-string acoustic, a naff 12 string, a couple of strats and a casio MIDI guitar
which I never use
.Johnnys got about 80 guitars so Ive not got
much by comparison!
Johnnys been encouraging me to play more guitar and funnily enough I
hope he wont mind me saying this but hes actually got a bit
worried recently about my playing. With this album, a lot of people cant
actually tell whos who when it comes to the guitar parts. Am I gonna
tell you? Nah, youll have to guess. But hes worried,
ha ha!
|