|

Photo by Jack Monsoon
Matt
Johnson
Heather Bell
IN CONVERSATION . . .
PART 1.
I recently caught up with Matt at the Lazarus building, the
former Victorian department store close to Londons square
mile that serves as his companys headquarters. Although
it was a sunny, if chilly, winters day outside, inside
TheThes womb-like basement studio, all was hot, dark
and spooky. Oil lamps turned and incense burned as small red
lights from the various banks of equipment blinked on and
off through the smokey darkness. Matt, in cheerful mood, was
busy sitting at the mixing desk compiling Silent Tongue, the
first volume of The Thes film music for CineOla, the
French soundtrack company newly acquired by Lazarus. I sat
at the back of the room on an old leather sofa sipping a mug
of fresh coffee listening, watching and waiting for him to
take a break.
I should explain, whilst Im sitting here waiting, that
I first became aware of Matts music whilst assistant
editor at Cinema Magazine in the early 1980s. Id
often listen to his early albums over the office stereo system
as foreign films played silently on my nearby video monitor.
I was struck then by the cinematic nature of his music and
surprised that it hadnt been used in more films. Hopefully
this new release will remedy that.
I didnt actually get to meet Matt or the band until
a decade or so later, following a wonderful performance at
a packed-out Barrowlands in Glasgow. The The were touring
in support of the Dusk album and Johnny Marr had just made
a surprise guest appearance. I managed to blag an interview
backstage with the sweat soaked pair for a local newspaper
I was working for at the time. We hit it off really well and
so I was very happy and flattered to be approached to write
the liner notes for Silent Tongue and to conduct a series
of interviews for this new site.
This following conversation is the first in an ongoing series.
The questions are a combination of those sent in by readers/viewers
of the Letters To The Editor forum, plus of course many of
my own.
HB. Well Matt, as agreed, this is the first in an ongoing
series of conversations that youll be having with me
and various other people for This Is TheThe Day. Ill
be asking a combination of my own questions with some of the
ones weve received in the Letters to the Editor forum.
MJ: Nice to see your cheerful face on this cold afternoon
in London Town.
HB: Thanks, likewise. Now, Ill start with some questions
from the forum first.
MJ: Ok.
J.M. Howard: How long does Matt intend to keep
working? Are we going to see him grow old but stay original
and relevant in his music. Would he be like the Stones, still
performing and attracting crowds into his 50s?
MJ: Erm ... Well, original and relevant are relative
terms. Everyone wants to feel that theyre still relevant
but relevant to who? To their audience? To themselves? Tastes
and perceptions change constantly and going in and out of
fashion is as inevitable as day becoming night so all I would
hope is that Im still relevant to myself and healthy
and energetic enough to record and perform if I still feel
the passion for it. Rather than the Rolling Stones, who are
pretty much just businessmen in my book. I look for inspiration
to someone like John Lee Hooker. He was playing shows right
up until a few days before he died and obviously because he
still really loved doing that more than anything else.
Bryn: What is the writing process for you Matt; from
an initial idea to what we hear on the records?
MJ: Well, the writing process usually involves various
stages. From playing around on a guitar, trying out combinations
of chords and just singing random melodies, skat vocals, gobbledygook,
into a small portable tape recorder. From there Ill
move to 4 or 8 track where Ill refine, add and subtract
ideas, playing with the key, tempo and time signature. Working
out the bass parts, drum parts etc. and playing with other
elements of sound. The lyrics really exist in a separate space
until later on when Ill start going through my lyric
books, I keep a bunch of them, to match up ideas and words
with the melodies and atmospheres of the demos. Sometimes
songs will come out fully formed but, sadly, Im not
one of those songwriters that can just bang off songs like
that. I have to work painstakingly over time constantly refining
and polishing. But there is another type of track like Good
Morning Beautiful or Boiling Point which are created within
the studio itself as a result of a lot of experimentation.
Bryn: Do you ever worry that you will not be able to
perform material live that is faithful to the recording and
do you think about this when you are writing and/or in the
studio?
MJ: As far as live work goes, yes I used to worry about
not being able to perfectly recreate the recordings on stage
but I got over that. I figure that if the audience are so
attached to the originals they can always put on the CD. I
also figure I should have the leeway to be able to experiment
and twist the songs round any way I want. It also makes it
more interesting for me on the road and also when putting
together a new band to let them express themselves rather
than just being slaves to the original. Thats why the
versions of the songs sound quite different on each of the
three world tours Ive done so far, and will certainly
do so on the next one.
Bryn: I am wondering about the bass I hear on Dusk.
it's almost more of a feeling than a sound. I have heard of
this thing called a DBX 120XP harmonic synthesizer. Could
this be it?
MJ: I cant give away TheThes trade secrets
(laughs) but youre right, we did have a DBX sub-harmonic
synth in the studio although thats not all. There was
also some of my special sonic ingredients poured
on to give that ultra-lo feeling.
Bryn: Is there a particular aspect to The The that
you enjoy most? (i.e. writing, recording, playing live, break,
etc.)
MJ: I enjoy most aspects of TheThe but probably the
actual songwriting itself is the best as that is the most
personal, pure and when feeling most connected to the muse
- when inspiration does choose to appear! Its really
one of the most beautiful and fulfilling experiences I know,
and if I think about it, is the main reason I do the job.
All the stuff after this is gravy. But all the other aspects
have their compensations too. Being in the studio with people
I like and watching the songs come to life. Being on the road
and having fun with the band and crew and seeing the audience
face to face with all the fun and excitement that entails.
Even travelling around the world talking to journalists. They're
not all bad, and you do meet some interesting and thoughtful
people.
Bryn: How has the internet and, in particular, thethe.com
changed what you do?
MJ: Lets see. The Internet hasnt really
changed what I do at all at this moment in time but Im
hoping through this website to eventually develop a much stronger
relationship with my audience around the world. Its
real early days for this new site but were just concentrating
on setting things up properly for an influx of new members
when the singles compilation is released.
Blern: In what ways has Frank Zappa influenced you,
musically, business savvy? and With me being the
Dad of a 4 year old wonderful girl daughter, I'm curious:
How has becoming a father affected you and how you feel about
the world?
MJ: Well, to tell the truth I was never a huge fan
of Zappas music but just a big admirer of what he stood
for. I certainly respect the way he set up his career and
business and in fact believe he provided a blue print for
many of us to follow, particularly now the Internet has made
it more viable. Yes, Fatherhood is incredible, and being present
at your own childs birth is one of lifes peak
experiences. The happiest day of my life so far. I dont
know if its changed my views on the world but its
brought forth a flood of childhood memories and altered my
perspective about myself and others close to me.
Vampirate: Are you happy with the way your stance against
the 'corporate monster' is going?
MJ: Well, like the much publicised War Against
Terrorism the War Against The Corporate Monster
will be a long drawn out affair (laughs) I see the establishment
of this new website as a small beachhead from which to launch
larger attacks in the future, but yes, I feel perversely optimistic.
Doug Walker: What musicians would you like to work
with that you haven't yet had the opportunity too? and
What CD finds its way into your stereo the most often?
MJ: Hmm. The first question is bit tricky. Theres
really not many names that spring to mind. Ive worked
with most of the people I wanted to work with and theres
probably some I havent heard yet that Ill probably
love. Off the top of my head a duet with either PJ Harvey
or the singer from Cat Power would be nice. As for the second
question, well that is without doubt a Tony Scott recording
from the 1960s, Music For Zen Meditation. That CD goes
everywhere with me. In a hotel room I place dark red silks
over the lamps, light my Tibetan incense, put on these wonderful
1960s recordings of Japanese flutes and drift off into
outer space.
Stephen Isley: A personal one first if you dont
mind, How much money do you make on tour? and
"What exactly is Lazarus? Ive seen it on your record
sleeves for years but I'm not sure who or what it what it
is?
MJ: Dear, oh dear (laughs) If only people realised
that every time I walk onto stage its the equivalent
of me having stopped at the ATM on the way to the venue, drawing
out a thousand dollars from my personal account and then throwing
it to the audience, Im serious. And remember I play
over a hundred shows per tour so that gives you some idea.
Touring costs a bloody fortune, unless youre a mega
group that sells truckloads of merchandising and attracts
corporate sponsorship or youre a band that travels in
a tiny van and sleeps rough and you do all the roadying yourself.
Otherwise you invariably lose money. This can even be on top
of the recoupable tour support you may be lucky to receive
from a record company. So no, I dont make money touring
and in fact I come off the road virtually broke after every
tour and with my accountant and bank telling me off, although
I do live in hope (laughs)
HB: And Lazarus? Youve been involved with that
for quite a number of years now havent you?
MJ: Lazarus is a very old company dating back to the
mid 19th century. Formed by Abraham Lazarus, who was a tailor,
he built the company up to encompass a chain of department
stores across East London, including Liverpool Street, Bishopsgate,
Houndsditch and Shoreditch. His sons and grandsons continued
building the company up to include a small manufacturing base
to go along with the service industry side of the business.
A certain amount of decline set in years ago, because they
have a very old fashioned way of doing business, which although
inefficient, I happen to love. I initially got involved because
I bought into one of their old department stores in East London,
this place actually, I fell in love with it and it had a lot
of the facilities I was looking for, such as recording, photographic
and video studios. Money was tight for me, as usual, so a
fair degree of wheeling and dealing went on. I just didn't
have the cash at the time so I agreed to swap shares in my
old company, TheThe Music Limited, for shares in Lazarus.
The relationship has just developed from there to the point
where Im actually signed to Lazarus as a production
company as well as them being involved in the publishing side
too.
HB: But youre now one of the owners?
MJ: Yes, and Im fairly involved in things now
too. It was my suggestion to get Cally involved (TheThe manager)
to help run things on the music side. Hed had a lot
of experience from all parts of the industry, including management
with Julian Cope, the Nick Drake estate, A&R for PhonoGram
and Art & Design for Island Records and Antart amongst
many other things so he seemed to be someone that Lazarus
would like. They did and were quite happy to get him involved.
HB: What are the plans with Lazarus?
MJ: Well, as I spelt out with that TheThe Versus The
Corporate Monster piece we find ourselves with a very changed
business. Its disconcerting really so although I dont
want to be signed up to a major label again, given all the
inequities involved, but I do need some kind of infrastructure
and vehicle through which to keep expressing myself and to
keep working. So at Lazarus weve been drawing up a blueprint
for a multifaceted company that would allow me to keep my
'artistic independence and freedom' but still be able to fund
the various projects I want to do. So were trying to
put together a small group of companies, tightly woven and
inter layered but each taking care of a different aspect of
what were trying to do. Its basic time consuming
infrastructure building. Remember from leaving Sony to joining
Universal and then leaving Universal to sort of rejoin Sony
there were three vast amounts of legal paperwork and costs
not to mention the colossal amount of time it wastes. Im
trying to put into place a stable set up that will enable
me to maintain my independence but also fund future projects.
I just dont want to involve myself again in a major
label situation but if I did it would have to be different
to the situations in the past , with me retaining ownership
of rights. I have so much material to release. I know Ive
gone on about it in the past, much to the frustration of many
members of my audience, but for a start there are the three
unreleased albums, Spirits, P.O.D and GunSluts as well as
as hundred of hours of live recordings, demos, alternative
versions, instrumentals and film music pieces that I never
really had an outlet for during my Sony years due to the restrictive
nature of my old contract, which meant that unless the album
I delivered was all new material with vocals it wouldnt
count and you wouldnt get paid an advance, so why bother
handing them anything? Besides I own the rights to this stuff
so I thought Id just wait and do it myself. The things
is, that I have such a huge archive of tapes that itll
take months to go through and log it all properly. But the
reason I seem so cheerful is that I'm too excited about the
future to be bitter about the past.
HB: TheThe Versus The Corporate Monster, was very widely
circulated across the Internet, seen by many people and drew
a huge response. I know youve left the Universal corporation
and youre working again with Epic/Sony at the moment
but what is your current recording contract status? And how
does that relate to the Corporate Monster statement.
MJ: Well, as Ive just explained, Im actually
signed to Lazarus, which now acts as my production and publishing
company, but youre right in that I am currently working
with Sony again for a while. Before I left them I agreed to
come back, record some new material and, in a joint venture
with Lazarus, oversee the compilations of CDs and DVDs
as well as remastering and repackaging the entire back catalogue.
The truth is, although I tried to buy the rights to my back
catalogue, they refused. They still own the material and could
and would do with it what they wanted to, and probably very
badly and cheaply too, unless I came back and oversaw the
whole project. But its actually nice to be back and
in all honesty I never really wanted to leave Sony. I was
just very unhappy about the terrible deal I was on, but theres
an inherent unfairness about the entire music industry generally.
It really doesnt matter which label you go with as the
deals are awful and unfair everywhere. If you are going to
work with a major It boils down to who you like working with.
In this respect there is no comparison between Sony and Universal.
As for what happens after this year? Well, well all
have to wait and see how things pan out but one things
for sure is that Ill be retaining rights to all my recordings.
Id never again sign the kind of deals I did when I was
a kid.
End of Part 1.
Onto
part two >
|